Technology ADMIN August 2, 2025 0 Comments

Evaluate the Legal Technology Company Ankar on Patent Proofreading

In the rapidly evolving field of intellectual property (IP) and patent automation, many organizations are shifting toward legal technology platforms that promise to streamline patent drafting, analysis, and filing processes. One such emerging player is Ankar, a London-based legal tech startup founded in 2024. In this article, we will evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading, examining its core features, strengths, limitations, and how it fits into the broader patent drafting and quality-checking workflow.

Understanding Ankar: Background and Innovation

Ankar is positioned as an “AI-native IP platform” aiming to cover the full lifecycle of innovation, from identifying novel ideas and generating patent claims to analyzing risk and drafting patent documents. Founded by ex-Palantir engineers, Ankar quickly gained industry attention for its unique AI-powered approach to IP automation. Their goal is to act as a central operating system for R&D teams, in-house counsel, and patent attorneys.

The platform supports several innovation tasks, such as:

Mapping novelty against 150+ million global patents.
Drafting claims and specifications with intelligent structure.
Providing strategic insights like freedom-to-operate (FTO) and risk assessment.
Offering ready-to-file outputs for USPTO and EPO formats.

However, to thoroughly evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading, we must dive into a specific function that is critical for final patent quality—proofreading.

What is Patent Proofreading and Why It Matters?

Patent proofreading is more than just fixing typos or grammar. It is a legal and technical quality control process that ensures the patent document adheres to required formatting, jurisdictional rules, claim consistency, and terminological accuracy. A proper proofreading tool should detect and flag:

Antecedent basis errors: e.g., when claim terms are not properly introduced.
Inconsistent claim dependencies or numbering.
Misused language that could limit the scope of protection.
Missing figure references or unsupported claim language.
Formatting issues specific to jurisdictions like the USPTO or EPO.

Tools like Patent Bots and Solve Intelligence offer dedicated patent proofreading capabilities that align with these needs. They provide live feedback, tracked changes, compliance warnings, and style rule enforcement—something essential before filing.

Does Ankar Offer Patent Proofreading Features?

When we evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading, it becomes clear that Ankar does not currently offer a dedicated proofreading module in the traditional sense. Instead, it focuses more on upstream automation—creating draft documents, analyzing novelty, and accelerating the initial claim-writing process. While its automated structuring helps reduce early-stage errors, Ankar lacks many proofreading-specific features that law firms require before filing a patent.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison:

Feature	Ankar AI (2025)	Traditional Proofreading Tools (e.g., Patent Bots)
Antecedent basis flagging	Not available	Available with detailed feedback
Claim dependency checking	Basic via auto-structured claims	Advanced logic-based checking
Format and jurisdictional style rules	Templates available, but no active validation	Active enforcement of USPTO, EPO rules
Tracked changes and version history	Limited	Full redlining and document history
Terminology consistency	AI-assisted drafting; no enforcement	Alerts for inconsistent terminology
Figure cross-reference checking	Not included	Automated detection of missing/mismatched references

Thus, while Ankar helps reduce certain drafting risks through structured templates, it does not replace the rigorous checks needed for final proofreading. To truly evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading, it is important to understand this gap and identify where Ankar fits best in the overall patent workflow.

Strengths of Ankar in Patent Drafting

Even though it lacks a dedicated proofreading engine, Ankar delivers value in many upstream areas that indirectly support patent quality. For example:

Speeds up patent drafting by 60% using structured templates and AI-driven suggestions.
Helps identify whitespace in innovation portfolios, reducing the chances of claim overlaps.
Simplifies the invention disclosure process for inventors and engineers.
Exports documents in clean formats, compatible with USPTO and EPO filing.

These strengths make Ankar highly effective during the earlier stages of the patent process—before final quality assurance is needed.

Limitations for Patent Proofreading

On the other hand, when you evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading specifically, the limitations become more apparent:

No structural error detection: Claims with missing antecedents or improper references can go unnoticed.
No automated compliance checklists: Unlike Patent Bots, Ankar cannot ensure adherence to examiner-style rules.
No redlining tools: You cannot track edits or create reviewer feedback loops inside the platform.
Lack of jurisdictional proofreading presets: It doesn’t adapt based on the target patent office’s requirements.

Therefore, Ankar cannot yet serve as a full replacement for traditional proofreading tools.

Recommended Workflow: How to Use Ankar Efficiently

To get the best results from Ankar while maintaining quality, patent teams can follow a hybrid workflow:

Use Ankar to generate early-stage drafts from invention disclosures.
Export the draft into a proofreading tool like Patent Bots or Solve Intelligence.
Perform structural and formatting quality checks using those tools.
Apply manual review by legal experts to ensure all jurisdictional and legal compliance needs are met.

This way, you benefit from Ankar’s speed while still maintaining the integrity of your patent filings.

Cost and Time Analysis: Is It Worth It?

Here’s a breakdown to help evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading from an ROI perspective:

Task	Without Ankar	With Ankar + QC Tool
Drafting Time (per app)	8–10 hours	3–4 hours
Proofreading Time	2–3 hours (manual)	1–2 hours (with tool support)
Total Time	10–13 hours	4–6 hours
Human Errors Detected	High (manual review only)	Low (assisted with QC tools)

So, when used in combination with dedicated proofreading software, Ankar can contribute to both time and cost savings.

Conclusion: Should You Use Ankar for Patent Proofreading?

To conclude, when you evaluate the legal technology company Ankar on patent proofreading, the answer depends on what stage of the patent lifecycle you’re focusing on. Ankar is a powerful drafting and innovation management tool but not a replacement for dedicated proofreading platforms. It can help generate clean, structurally sound drafts quickly but lacks the depth of review needed for final submission.

For law firms, in-house patent teams, or corporate IP departments aiming for high-quality filings, Ankar works best when paired with a proper proofreading solution. This hybrid setup ensures you benefit from automation without sacrificing legal accuracy.